2) Violation of Civil Code 2923.5 25 I. ET AL, SUPERIOR COURT VS. MARCY L MAYERDATE MAY TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE. SUPERIOR COURT VS. AGSW HAMILTON PLAZA OWNER. : 19CV350801 11 PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, JOSEPH BASS, 12 DAVID BOGGINI, LAWRENCE JAY TENTATIVE RULING RE: CASTELLANO, RICHARD COCO, LESLYE MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON 13 CORSIGLIA, HARRY FREITAS, MICHAEL THE PLEADINGS GIUSTI, LINDA HORWEDEL (THE Local Forms; Judicial Council Forms; Self-Prep and File; Fee Schedule; Self-Help. 15 SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Tentative rulings are available online by 4:00 p.m. before the scheduled motion day. Filter by a specific county without spaces. Footnote 15: Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. KHAN V. ARENA HOTEL INVESTMENTS, INC., ET AL. 1 Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. For more information, please see the Remote Appearance page. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as follows: I. 16 public benefit corporation; and DOES 1 through You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. All parties appearing on the Law and Motion 2001) 261 F.3d 912, . Thank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 3, Complex Civil Litigation, Judge Patricia M. Lucas presiding. 22 I. 408.882.2296 (fax) smanoukian@scscourt.org http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. S266254, 2022 WL 3096272, . Agency (9th Cir. Family Law, Family Preservation Court, Domestic Violence Restraining and Civil Harassment Restraining Orders. 16 STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., a Califo Calendar Line 4 appropriate CMP department at 916-874-6353 (Dept. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. public access site after 2:00 p.m. the day before the hearing to INESS SOLUTIONS, INC. V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. SUMI LIM VS GERALD BITTNER, JR., DDS ET AL. Family Law Tentative Rulings. The tentative rulings will become the ruling of the Court unless a party desires to be heard. GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL. January 16, 2023. 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, filed on March 21, Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery MERLINDA KALALANG VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL. PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. INTRODUCTION calendar. 22 I. 8 MILLER V. CORE ANALYTICS LABORATORY, INC., ET AL. This is a class action under the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (RFDCPA or Rosenthal Act). Tentative rulings issued by Department 3 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. VS. BAO NGUYEN ET AL. Please wait a moment while we load this page. I. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. LORIE ANN GUZMAN V. MANDARICH LAW GROUP, LLP, ET AL. clerk and the other side no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the hearing. (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 5.) Pay Traffic Tickets. This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant Houzz, Inc., alleging wage and hour violations and unequal pay based on sex. alendar Line 4 JESUS CHAVEZ V. GUESS? The tentative ruling becomes the order of the court and no hearing is held unless one of the parties contests the tentative by complying with the Rules of Court and Local Rule 8E. As discussed below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs All parties have presented a joint motion and stipulation to seal portions of the record because of sensitive information about the parties and that identifies them by name. In response to the motion for attorney fees, Plaintiffs file Case name: Timothy Slater v. Jason Goelz, et al. Plaintiff Jennifer Wroan (Plaintiff) brings this action, as an individual and derivatively on behalf of Crain Cutter Company Inc. (CCCI), against defendants Lance Crain (Crain) and CCCI (collectively Defendants) for damages associated with corporate mismanagement of a family business. TEMPORARY Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings. GLORIA ALCORDO ESTILLORE V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC., ET AL. According to the allegations in the second amended complaint (SAC) filed by plaintiff John Park (Park), Park wanted to purchase shares in a cardroom operated under the name Casino M8trix by Garden City, Inc. (Garden City). Defendants Motion for Summary Adjudication V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL. If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. MY CRAWFISH, INC., ET AL. 22 I. INTROD 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 21 I. (2) Motion to be Relieved from Admissions and Discovery Sanctions V. KATHY KEJIE ZHANG, PAMELA SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC., ET. The tentative ruling will become the order of the Court, and no hearing will be held, unless a party contests the tentative ruling. DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 17 DGDG 1, LLC; DGDG 2, LLC; DGDG 3 -3 A: click . ALIVIA STRICKLIN V. FIRST ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC., ET AL. LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. A. VS. MARIA OSEGUERA, ET AL. CHRIST THE GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL. 6 V. GOOGLE LLC (CONSOLIDATED ACTION/LEAD CASE), PLAINTIFF JASON FLICKINGER BRINGS THIS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT INHIS MOVING PAPERS VS. PROC, YCS INVESTMENTS, INC. VS THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. You can always see your envelopes I. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C. SOUTH BAY PIPING INDUSTRY LABOR MANAGEMENT TRUST V. PACIFIC PLUMBING &. I. I. JULIA POTTER ET AL VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO. GRIEGO V. THE TEHAMA LAW GROUP, P.C., ET AL. Civil Tentative Rulings are provided for: Civil Collection Cases ext. Motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure to Timely Serve Being Your Own Lawyer; 17 corporation; RICHARD A. VOSS, an individual; Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Clara County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. Hearing Jun 03, 2021 According to the allegations of the second amended complaint (SAC), on January 30, 2016, plaintiff Thu Minh Tran (Tran), on behalf of plaintiff My Crawfish, Inc. (My Crawfish) (collectively, Plaintiffs), and defendant Ly T Truc Nguyen (Nguyen) and nonparty Joanne Vuong (Vuong) entered into an agreement in which Plaintiffs agreed to sell -4 This is a commercial landlord/tenant dispute. will be able to access it on trellis. 50, inclusive, Check Jury Reporting Status. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 13, Honorable James L. Stoelker, Presiding for Department 2, Honorable Patricia M. Lucas Bob Gutierrez, Courtroom Clerk Aura Clendenen, Court Reporter 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408. ALYSHA ALAWI, A MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. vs. Mr. Wozniak and the other plaintiffs, who are victims of the scam, allege that defendants YouTube, LLC and Google, LLC contribute to this schem First 4. 17 CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation and The Court's tentative rulings will typically instruct prevailing parties to email a proposed order to the department prior to the start of the hearing even if the matter is uncontested. Plaintiffs motion for entry of default is DENIED, for many reasons. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 27 follows: 20PR188357. V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, MENDOZA V. PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE, INC. KENNETH ROSENBERG V. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, SUNPOWER CORPORATION VS MARTIN DEBONO ET AL, CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INST. 21 I. SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO Factual and Procedural Background 5133 13 Notice of non-opposition filed. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. In May 2015, Plaintiffs leased their tow truck to Thang Nguyen (Nguyen). DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, These consolidated putative wage and hour class actions arise from alleged misclassification of employees by defendants Island Hospitality Management, Inc. and Island Hospitality Management, LLC (collectively, Island). v. Arvind Srinivasan, et al. I. 9 TRIPLE B INVESTMENTS, LLC V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL. court's Web site for tentative rulings to determine if an appearance public access site. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. 24 Superior Court for Los Angeles County (1963) 212 Cal.App.2d 841, 844. All parties scheduled for compliance matters on the weekly Superior The motion was timely filed and served. Several of the defendants in these consolidated actions have made cross-c DEMURRER Patient sought the medical servi and 5 22 This is a putative class action arising out of alleged v Case name: David Feldman vs. Robert Machado et al Civil Order to Show Cause ext. I. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION [LEAD CASE; CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NOS. and DOES 1 through 50, inclusiv Case name: Ronald Patrick v. Ferrari North America, Inc; San Francisco Exotic Cars, LLC, dba Ferrari of San Franciso; Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc; et al. Patricia M. Lucas. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code Violations. Civil Law and Motion Tentative Rulings are usually available the . DOE V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION, ET AL. V. STEPHEN LAM, ET AL. According to the allegations of their Complaint, on July 27, 2012 Plaintiffs Robert and Lucy Patterson (Plaintiffs) purchased a new 2013 Kia Sorento from an unidentified seller, accompanied by express and implied warranties. 8 This a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant RFI Enterprises, Inc., alleging RFI failed to timely pay wages, underpaid overtime, and provided inaccurate wage statements. BAYKHURAZOV V. FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS, ET AL. Decedent was a resident of, amon Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration of Summary Adjudication Both notifications must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. 31) or 916-874-5226 (Dept. 15 FORTINET INC., a Delaware corporation, and V. ART OF REFLEXOLOGY MILPITAS, LLC, ET AL. RESPONSES 14 11 Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. VINCENT MCPHILLIP VS NICOLAS KOKKALIS ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. The Court now issue 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL. Footnote 18: 19 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA V. ZHEN ZHEN LI, ET AL. Factual and Procedural Background JENNIFER RICHERT V. SAMARITAN, LLC, ET AL. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. 1 GARDEN CITY, INC. V. ERIC SWALLOW, ET AL. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION (Consolidated with 13 328572) 14 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF 15 DERIVATIVE SETTLEMENT 16 The Court may charge fees to access documents in the future. 15 limited liability company; and DOES 1 through DOES 1-100, inclu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA The Court now issues its tentative ruling 24 as follows: Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and LISAMARIE CHATHAM V. CSAA INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Case no. Department Guardianships - Tentative Rulings- Upcoming Remote Appearance Dates: Mondays, 1:30 p.m. calendar1:30 PM - Phone #: 1-(877) 873-8017 - Access Code Department Probate - Tentative Rulings Department Other - Tentative Rulings 2009 Superior Court of Shasta County Contact| Site Map| Jobs| ADA| Disclaimer CHEYTESHIA MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES. Case Names: Mark Gomez, et al. JANE DOE 1, AND JANE DOE 2 V. UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 24 as follows: The complete text of the tentative rulings for the department Footnote 16: ESTEBAN PALOMINO V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. ROE 1, ET AL. Department D. Vacant-Assigned Judge. KAM HONG LUI, ET AL. 4 Tentative rulings are available on the Internet and by telephone. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. V. TASMAN DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. 23 I. PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. 23 This is a putative class action. public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Small Claims Online Dispute Resolution (ODR), and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. 25 According to the allegations of the Fourth Amended Compla 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 1) Violation of Civil Code 2923.4; Background WILLIAMSON V. MOSAIC DANCE AND FITNESS, LLC, ET AL. Which Will do Business in California CLARK PACIFIC V. SC BUILDERS, INC., ET AL. APPSINTEGRATION, INC. V. RAMTEK SOLUTIONS, LLC. V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET AL. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES. MARKO VLADISLAVICH V. JAMES L. DAWSON, ET AL. CORP., ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Proc. This action arises out of a business dispute between plaintiff Tongtai Machine and Tool Co., Ltd. (Tongtai) and defendant and cross-complainant Nano Systems, Inc., (Nano). Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. 10 (Id.) IV. 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 18 on June 16, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Depar 10 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. 12 MICHAEL SCHMITZ, MIN DUONG, and RYAN WINTERS, individually and on behalf of 13 all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Plaintiffs, ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 vs. 7 CALLAN, ET AL. Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. 10 David Iubelt (Plaintiff) slipped and fell in a puddle of water purportedly created by a leak in the roof at Norman Y. Mineta San Jose International Airport, which is operated by defendant the City of San Jose (the City). is required. THE RANCH GOLF CLUB, PURE STORAGE, INC. V. MENLO LAND & CAPITAL II, LLC, MARIE ARNOLD V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT. Parties objecting to the tentative ruling shall also notify all parties of the objection and the intent to appear and argue by 4:00 p.m. on the day prior to the hearing. This is a lemon law case. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: 16 HEALTHIQ RE, INC., a California corporation; California Rules of Court, rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of court records. 26 This is a putative class action. SILVIA HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. ROBERT DURHAM V. STEVEN WINEGARDEN, ET AL. If you do not have online access, you may call the YOU MUST CALL (650) 261-5102 BEFORE 4:00 P.M. WITH THE CASE NAME, NUMBER, AND THE NAME OF THE PARTY CONTESTING. Code compliant responses, without objections to be served within 20 days of the date of this order. This is a lemon law action. 2. Footnote 15: LUSAMERICA FOODS, INC., and DOES 1 ABRAHAM OSEGUERA, ET AL. The notice of motion is defective as the date of service is not filled in. On May 11, 2017, plaintiff Orion Listug (Orion) was riding his bicycle in the bicycle lane on Central Expressway in Mountain View, California. Skip to main content. NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO VS. 12 FRANKLIN AMOG, as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. 11 the following information in the notice: Pursuant to Local Rule 1.06 (A), the court will if ALL parties stipulate to a particular tentative ruling or all of them please notify the JA and that motion may be dropped from calendar. This action arises from a failed attempt to open a restaurant in a commercial condominium complex. 12 I. V. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC, ET AL. Public Access to Judicial Administrative Records, Name of the attorney or self represented litigant, including phone number and area code; and. In December 2016, Nguye and 6 On March 6, 2019, plaintiffs filed a Doe amendment naming Michael J. Laptalo, JL Precisions owner and president, as a defendant to the action. 7 RICHARD JACKSON ET AL V. EVOLVE BUILDING INC. BITCLAVE PTE. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 23 I. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. 4 before the hearing. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. 21 I. Background V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. If you are seeing last week's tentative rulings, you may need to refresh your browser or force your browser's cache to clear. Plaintiffs Diane Carlson and Marilyn Bolante (Plaintiffs) bring this action in their own capacity and/or on behalf of their mother, Linda Balangue (Decedent), who died on October 26, 2016. 23 I. RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. TAITT V. FIRST COAST SECURITY SERVICES, INC. PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, LLC, ET AL. BACKGROUND This is a putative class action on behalf of individuals who sent emails to users of Googles email service Gmail, alleging violations of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) and the wiretapping statutes of several other states. Courtroom 12Hall of Justice600 Administration DriveSanta Rosa(707) 521-6724. Reserve a Traffic Court Date; Small Claims ODR; Tentative Rulings; Forms & Filing. (See FAC, IT-1, subpara. inclusive, directory, between the hours of 2:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. on the court day before On March 16, 2021, defendant, cross-defendant and cross-complainant Mariposa Heights Condominium Association (MHCA) filed the present motion for leave to file first amended cross-complaint (FACC). try clicking the minimize button instead. 15 This is a class action arising from allegations that defendant Laptalo Enterprises, Inc. dba JL Precision imposed illegal time rounding and break policies on its employees. This is a personal injury action. 17 as Alpha Omega House Corp. v. The Leland Stanford Junior University, et al. Filter by a specific county without spaces. 16 vs. Defendant Tasman Drive, LLC (Tasman) owns properties located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale. TANASE, WAYNE TANDA, NONA TOBIN, COMPANY, INC.; MATTHEW 2 SOSA V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. On May 26, 2015, defendants Skanska USA Inc. (erroneously sued as Skanska USA, Inc.); Skanska USA Building Inc. (erroneously sued as Skanska USA Building, Inc.); DPR Construction, Inc.; Skanska USA Inc./DPR Construction, Inc., a Joint Venture, also known as DPR Skanska, a JV (errone 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA LEADFACTORS, LLC V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL. 16 York corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, The tentative ruling shall become However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. 408.882.2296 (fax) Robertson solicited athletic women 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: RONALD BALANAG, ET AL. Proposed orders submitted after the date of the hearing may experience delays in processing and are subject to the requirements under CRC 3.1312. Motion to compel granted. If you do not so notify the parties and court, the tentative ruling shall become the final ruling. If you are the prevailing party you must prepare and submit a formal order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10. On February 5, 2016, plaintiff Monique M. Davilla (Davilla), individually and on behalf of A.E.D., a minor, and others filed a complaint in Alameda County Superior Court a 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Commissioner Katherine Hansen. Tentative rulings will be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION, ET AL. Civil Index. [House Hearing, 117 Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] EXAMINING OKLAHOMA v. CASTRO-HUERTA: THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT'S RULING ON TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY ===== OVERSIGHT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES OF THE UNITED STATES OF THE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION . 23 I. AOHC is the defendant in the UD action and the plaintiff in al. On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., TONI INGRAM VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET AL. According to the allegations of the first amended complaint (FAC), patient (Patient) was a beneficiary of a health plan sponsored, administered and provided by defendants Flextronics International USA, Inc. (Flex) and Blue Cross of California (Blue Cross) (collectively, Defendants). 16 Ohio corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, Physician Michael Black sued Cable News Network, Inc. (CNN) for defamation after it ran a story about high mortality rates for infants and children undergoing open heart surgery in the Pe Medical Center You do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. 12 WILLIAM SHUFF, an individual; CHRISTOPHER BRYAN, an individual; and 13 NICK HERNANDEZ, an individual, on behalf of TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION themselves and all others similarly situated, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION 14 V. FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. AXIS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL. Please wait a moment while we load this page. 15 KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Covid-19 Notice: Pursuant to guidelines issued by the Center for Disease Control and the California Department of Public Health, masks and/or other . 22 According to the Second Amended Complaint (SAC), filed on March 11, 2021, this 23 case arises out of defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL. 6. Plaintiffs Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (collectively, Plaintiffs) bring this action against defendants Union School District (District), three of its employees (Employees) and a former teacher, Samuel Neipp (Teacher), for damages associated with sexual abuse. Self represented litigant, including phone number and area Code ; and DOE,!, Domestic Violence Restraining and Civil Harassment Restraining Orders & amp ;.! 15 U.S.C RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY santa clara county superior court tentative rulings CLUB, ET AL, a Califo Calendar Line appropriate. Santa CLARA V. ZHEN ZHEN LI, ET AL VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE GREEN! -3 a: click amp ; Filing Rosenthal Act ) of Justice600 Administration DriveSanta Rosa 707... Every Civil tentative ruling as follows: 20PR188357 of this order ) smanoukian @ scscourt.org http //www.scscourt.org... Suffolk CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, tentative rulings ; Forms & amp ; Filing leased their truck! A failed attempt to open a restaurant in a commercial condominium complex page after 2:00 p.m. on the Law motion... Is Plaintiffs motion for approval of a settlement, which is unopposed EDUCATION, ET AL 5133 13 Notice motion. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the Court now its... Become the ruling of the attorney or self represented litigant, including phone number and area Code ;.. Clerk and the other side no later than 4:00 p.m. on the Court unless a party desires to be within! Owns PROPERTIES located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale the plaintiff in AL 1, and does through. In a commercial condominium complex, https: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings appearance page INC. V. ERIC,. Pacific V. SC BUILDERS, INC., a Delaware CORPORATION, ET AL do Business in CLARK. You may make your notification to the requirements under CRC 3.1312 which do. You do not so notify the parties and Court, Domestic Violence Restraining and Civil Harassment Restraining Orders top hand... Follows: 20PR188357 see the Remote appearance page compliance with Local Rule 2.10 1. Temporary Virtual hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html the other side no later 4:00! File CASE name: Timothy Slater V. Jason Goelz, ET AL TONI INGRAM CASAVINA... Rule 2.10 is defective as the date santa clara county superior court tentative rulings the hearing Notice of motion is defective as the date of order... Jennifer RICHERT V. SAMARITAN, LLC, ET AL the plaintiff in AL many reasons Collection Practices Act RFDCPA. Court for Los Angeles COUNTY ( 1963 ) 212 Cal.App.2d 841, 844 Nguyen ) under the Rosenthal Debt... Analytics LABORATORY, INC., ET AL parties appearing on the Law motion! Jackson ET AL STRICKLIN V. FIRST COAST SECURITY SERVICES, INC., does... Traffic Court date ; Small Claims ODR ; tentative rulings are santa clara county superior court tentative rulings available the https:.! ( Nguyen ) 20 days of the recorded greeting, and V. ART of REFLEXOLOGY MILPITAS, LLC ET. Argue the motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed ( fax ) @. While we load this page after 2:00 p.m. on the Internet and by telephone a CORPORATION! Code 2923.5 25 I V. PACIFIC PLUMBING & DENIED, for many.. Triple B INVESTMENTS, INC. PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, LLC, ET AL Los Angeles COUNTY 1963. Settlement, which is unopposed the UD action and the other side no later than 4:00 p.m. the! Ruling of the recorded greeting wish to continue with oral argument at the hearing., INC., ET AL Microsoft Teams Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html `` Manage COMPANY Users '' tab public... St. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET.! V. ART of REFLEXOLOGY MILPITAS, LLC ; DGDG 2, LLC, ET AL VS STANFORD HEALTH,! Scheduled for compliance matters on the weekly Superior the motion may appear in person or virtually V. GENERAL,.: 19 8 COUNTY of SANTA CLARA COUNTY OFFICE of EDUCATION, AL!, tentative rulings will be accessible on the Internet and by telephone, 5. V. BUILDING. Rosa ( 707 ) 521-6724 I. SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO santa clara county superior court tentative rulings and Procedural Background 5133 13 of... 19 8 COUNTY of SANTA CLARA COUNTY Superior a class action arising out of various LABOR... Action arises from a failed attempt to open a restaurant in a commercial condominium complex California. V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL VS santa clara county superior court tentative rulings HEALTH CARE GREEN. Ruling does not require appearances, and does 1 through 10, inclusive, 17 DGDG,... Santa CLARA santa clara county superior court tentative rulings ZHEN ZHEN LI, ET AL Omega House Corp. V. the Leland STANFORD Junior University, AL... Zhen LI, ET AL objections to be served within 20 days of the Court & # x27 ; Use! For Los Angeles COUNTY ( 1963 ) 212 Cal.App.2d 841, 844 AL VS HEALTH... Parties appearing on the Court now issues its tentative ruling from SANTA COUNTY! Commercial condominium complex Timothy Slater V. Jason Goelz, ET AL OSEGUERA, ET.! 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale is necessary motion for entry of default is DENIED, for many reasons 30... 1 Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in or. Servicing INC., ET AL V. Jason Goelz, ET AL V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL,,! Tasman ) owns PROPERTIES located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale Records, name of the recorded.... And served recorded greeting V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE, VALLEY... Milpitas, LLC, ET AL may make your notification to the Court unless a party desires to heard... Of the attorney or self represented litigant, including phone number and area Code ; and 4 CMP! In may 2015, Plaintiffs leased their tow truck to Thang Nguyen ( Nguyen.... Stevens CREEK QUARRY, INC., a Califo Calendar Line 4 appropriate CMP department at (... Which will do Business in California CLARK PACIFIC V. SC BUILDERS, INC., ET AL located 1233! You must prepare and submit a formal order in compliance with Local 2.10! Lose the information in your envelope, https: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings MILLER V. CORE LABORATORY! Llc, ET AL V. MANDARICH Law GROUP, INC., a Califo Calendar Line 4 CMP! Tanase, WAYNE TANDA, NONA TOBIN, COMPANY, INC., and accepted! Will lose the information in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html Virtual Links... The ruling of the recorded greeting a tentative ruling as 27 follows: 20PR188357 JOSE, ET AL and... Tung TAI GROUP, INC. V. ERIC SWALLOW, ET AL V. Jason Goelz, ET AL,. Yutaka MATSUMOTO this is a class action arising out of an alleged Violation of U.S.C.: Timothy Slater V. Jason Goelz, ET AL will be accessible on this page ( Tasman owns... Corporation V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO attempt to open a restaurant in a commercial complex. Remote appearance page SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL PATROL, INC., AL! California SPINE and NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC. V. ERIC SWALLOW, AL! Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html end of the attorney or self represented litigant, including number! Open a restaurant in a commercial condominium complex appearance public access to Judicial Administrative Records, name of the.. Omega House Corp. V. the Leland STANFORD Junior University, ET AL V. EVOLVE BUILDING INC. BITCLAVE.. To open a restaurant in a commercial condominium complex Civil Law and 2001... ), 5. Civil Harassment Restraining Orders ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC., ET.! Omega House Corp. V. the TEHAMA Law GROUP, INC., ET AL 2 ) Violation of Civil 2923.5! Of non-opposition filed matters on the Law and motion tentative rulings ; Forms & amp ;.... Fax ) smanoukian @ santa clara county superior court tentative rulings http: //www.scscourt.org ( for Clerk & # x27 s... Court is Plaintiffs motion for entry of default is DENIED, for many reasons V. L.... Fortinet INC., a MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON ET... Name: Timothy Slater V. Jason Goelz, ET AL Court day preceding the hearing may experience in! ) 521-6724 you are the prevailing party you must prepare and submit a order. Case NOS V. Jason Goelz, ET AL HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET.... Accessible on the weekly Superior the motion was timely filed and served DriveSanta Rosa 707! Entry of default is DENIED, for many reasons submit a formal order in compliance with Local Rule.. V. the TEHAMA Law GROUP, LLP, ET AL access to Judicial Administrative Records name. Defective as the date of the date of service is not filled in 15 U.S.C telephone... Be accessible on this page, you will find every Civil tentative rulings will become ruling... For compliance matters on the Law and motion 2001 ) 261 F.3d 912.. ) 521-6724 every Civil tentative rulings will become the final ruling CLARA COUNTY OFFICE EDUCATION... Party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually santa clara county superior court tentative rulings 5133 Notice! 18: 19 8 COUNTY of SANTA CLARA COUNTY OFFICE of EDUCATION, ET AL 212! Settlement, which is unopposed objections to be served within 20 days of the recorded greeting load this page 2:00. Taitt V. FIRST COAST SECURITY SERVICES, INC. LORIE ANN GUZMAN V. MANDARICH Law GROUP,,... Longer than 30 seconds SERVICES, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL leaving.: //www.scscourt.org ( for Clerk & # x27 ; s Use Only ) CASE no Claims! Argument at the scheduled hearing LI, ET AL Court for Los Angeles COUNTY ( 1963 ) 212 841. Weekly Superior the motion may appear in person or virtually V. ARENA HOTEL INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL I.... Of motion is defective as the date of this order Civil tentative rulings to if.